Skip to main content (Press Enter).
Toggle navigation
US Army War College - Publications
US Army War College - Publications
Search Army War College - Publications:
Search
Search
Search Army War College - Publications:
Search
Home
Regional Issues
Western Hemisphere
Europe & Russia
Middle East & North Africa
Central Asia & Caucasus
Sub-Saharan Africa
Asia Pacific
Strategic Issues
School of Strategic Landpower
Homeland Defense & Security Issues
Era of Persistent Conflict
Military Leadership
Military Change/Transformation
Landpower & Sustainment
Strategy & Policy
Center for Strategic Leadership
Collins Center Update
Issue Papers
Studies
Futures Seminar
Collections
PKSOI
PKSOI Papers
PKSOI Journal
Recent Articles
Army Heritage and Education Center
About Us
Contributors
USAWC Press
Parameters
Parameters Bookshelf
Podcasts
Press Collections
Archive
Army War College Review
The Carlisle Compendia
Colloquium Briefs
Letort Papers
Op-Eds
Practitioner's Corner
Articles
Books
Conference Papers
IRPs
Monographs
Strategic Estimate
For Authors
Press Tips
Publishing Guide
Contact Us
Home
:
News
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
22
Parameters | Summer 2025
June 18, 2025
— Welcome to the Summer 2025 issue of Parameters. This issue consists of an In Focus special commentary, three forums (Indo-Pacific Challenges, Russia-Ukraine Issues, and Historical Studies). ...
MORE
Book Reviews
June 18, 2025
— Book reviews summer 2025...
MORE
Restoring the Primacy of Army Mobilization Planning: Lessons from the Interwar Period (1919–41)
June 18, 2025
— This article argues that the US Army must restore the primacy of mobilization planning to prepare for the growing likelihood of a protracted large-scale war involving the United States. While the Army’s transformation initiatives have emphasized important tactical matters, this piece calls attention to critical strategic vulnerabilities associated with mobilization—one of the Army’s enduring core functions. The article identifies insights, challenges, and recommendations for contemporary leaders and practitioners by analyzing the body of thought on mobilization planning during the interwar period (1919–41) and drawing connections to the present day...
MORE
The Enduring Lessons of Vietnam: Implications for US Strategy and Policy
June 18, 2025
— This article argues that the Vietnam War is a useful case study for assessing an enduring flaw in America’s approach to war. The United States suffered defeat in Vietnam because it privileged military strength and the pursuit of victory on the battlefield over other elements of national power. As in Vietnam, the wars America will likely face in the future will blend conventional and unconventional methods and use a carefully calibrated mixture of military and non-military means. The United States must situate its demonstrated strengths in conventional war fighting within a holistic framework or face similar strategic outcomes...
MORE
What the Russia-Ukraine Conflict Tells Us about Educational Resilience
June 18, 2025
— While education can operate as a source of vulnerability or resiliency across multiple domains before, during, and after armed conflicts, it is often examined narrowly in the context of a single domain, limiting the use and effectiveness of civil-affairs operations. This article outlines a novel conceptual framework of the primary mechanisms across seven unique domains by which education can serve as a key area of resiliency or vulnerability in armed conflicts. Through a case study of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, it illustrates how vulnerabilities can manifest in the seven domains and what can be done to build resiliency. Finally, a discussion of the costs, benefits, and potential role of military civil affairs in a post-conflict scenario will assist US policymakers and military professionals in identifying the opportunities, costs, and benefits of these operations...
MORE
A More Perfect Peace: Can the Russia-Ukraine War End Justly?
June 18, 2025
— This article argues that thinking creatively about war termination, both philosophically and politically, utilizing jus post bellum principles and counterintuitive political trade-offs, reveals an opportunity to achieve a sustainable peace that approximates justice. The article surveys how war aims among belligerents have changed, indicating that further change is possible, particularly at the point of war termination. Next, the article examines jus post bellum principles and their application to the Russia-Ukraine War. Finally, the article contends that Ukraine relinquishing Crimea and the Donbas in exchange for NATO membership might be the key to achieving a durable peace that addresses long-term security...
MORE
Strategic Narratives to Counter Global Threats
June 18, 2025
— This article argues that the current National Security Strategy lacks the necessary coherence and fidelity to mobilize collective action against the emerging Russia-China axis. It merges multiple theoretical concepts to assert that the “rules-based order” theme is insufficient for mobilizing public support. This article uses textual analysis of the strategy compared with publicly available polling to determine levels of popular resonance and finds that the “rules-based order emphasis” does not resonate. This study’s conclusions will assist practitioners as they develop an updated National Security Strategy with the advent of the new presidential administration...
MORE
China’s Role in a Future Korean War
June 18, 2025
— This article argues that China’s intervention in a Korean conflict will hinge more on North Korea’s ability to hold territory than on bilateral ties. Rather than treat Chinese intervention as a yes-or-no proposition, this study models three scenarios—full intervention, sustained support, and limited support—based on North Korean resilience. Using Chinese-language sources and scenario-based analysis, it assesses how each model would shape key functional areas such as ISR, cyber, materiel, and force posture. The findings offer US defense planners a framework for anticipating variable People’s Liberation Army involvement in a future Korea contingency...
MORE
The Next National Defense Strategy: Mission-Based Force Planning
June 18, 2025
— The Pentagon needs to embrace a new methodology called mission-based planning to size and shape the defense enterprise properly. This article summarizes and critiques several proposals for reestablishing the long-standing two major theater war construct in the face of ongoing shifts in the strategic environment, including the nation’s $36 trillion debt and prospects of annual interest payments beyond $1 trillion. Drawing upon four decades of experience in strategy/force planning at the service, the department, and the Office of the Secretary of Defense levels, the author presents a mission priority alternative that provides more strategic prioritization and is more in line with the new administration. Strategic-level service planners and students of Joint professional military education / top-level schools will benefit from the article and better understand the strategic context and key parameters of the internal debate at the Pentagon about the upcoming National Defense Strategy. ...
MORE
From the Editor in Chief
June 18, 2025
— Welcome to the Summer 2025 issue of Parameters. The issue consists of one In Focus special commentary and three forums (Indo-Pacific Challenges, Russia-Ukraine Issues, and Historical Studies). In our In Focus forum special commentary, “The Next National Defense Strategy: Mission-Based Force Planning,” Frank Hoffman argues that the Pentagon should embrace a new methodology called mission-based planning to size and shape the defense enterprise properly. He summarizes and critiques several proposals for reestablishing the long-standing two major theater war construct in the face of ongoing shifts in the strategic environment and offers a mission-priority alternative...
MORE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
22