Skip to main content (Press Enter).
Toggle navigation
US Army War College - Publications
US Army War College - Publications
Search Army War College - Publications:
Search
Search
Search Army War College - Publications:
Search
Home
Regional Issues
Western Hemisphere
Europe & Russia
Middle East & North Africa
Central Asia & Caucasus
Sub-Saharan Africa
Asia Pacific
Strategic Issues
School of Strategic Landpower
Homeland Defense & Security Issues
Era of Persistent Conflict
Military Leadership
Military Change/Transformation
Landpower & Sustainment
Strategy & Policy
Center for Strategic Leadership
Collins Center Update
Issue Papers
Studies
Futures Seminar
Collections
PKSOI
PKSOI Papers
PKSOI Journal
Recent Articles
Army Heritage and Education Center
About Us
Contributors
USAWC Press
Parameters
Parameters Bookshelf
Podcasts
Press Collections
Archive
Army War College Review
The Carlisle Compendia
Colloquium Briefs
Letort Papers
Op-Eds
Practitioner's Corner
Articles
Books
Conference Papers
IRPs
Monographs
Strategic Estimate
For Authors
Press Tips
Publishing Guide
Contact Us
Middle East & North Africa
Search
Search
AHEC
AHEC
Army War College Review
Articles
AWC Review
Books
Colloquium Briefs
CSL
Key Strategic Issues List (KSIL)
KSIL
Letort Papers
Middle East & North Africa
misc.
Monograph
Op-Ed
Parameters
PKSOI
Practitioner's Corner
Publications
SSL
The Carlisle Compendia
Working Papers
Strategic Effects of Conflict with Iraq: South Asia
Strategic Effects of Conflict with Iraq: South Asia Dr Amit Gupta Monograph by the US Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute "India and Pakistan have shied away from President Bush’s call for a military effort to change the regime in Baghdad. India’s official position was given in a joint statement during the official visit of Russian President Vladimir Putin to New Delhi in December 2002. The two governments agreed that..."
Published On: 3/1/2003
Strategic Effects of Conflict with Iraq: Southeast Asia
Strategic Effects of Conflict with Iraq: Southeast Asia Dr Anthony L Smith Monograph by the US Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute "The attacks of September 11, 2001, outraged governments throughout Southeast Asia, as they did around the world. All Southeast Asian countries condemned the attacks and expressed sympathy to the United States and its people. Washington sought support, in particular, from both Jakarta and Kuala Lumpur in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks. Within days President Megawati of Indonesia made a trip to the United States—a trip that was kept on track despite a general shut down of air traffic—in which the Indonesian leader denounced terrorism. The symbolism of the leader of the world’s largest Muslim country decrying international terrorism was important to U.S. policymakers."
Published On: 3/1/2003
Strategic Effects of Conflict with Iraq: Australia and New Zealand
Strategic Effects of Conflict with Iraq: Australia and New Zealand Dr Andrew Scobell Monograph by the US Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute "This study considers the strategic consequences of U.S. and allied military action against Iraq for the countries of Australia and New Zealand and provides some policy recommendations. The prospect of imminent U.S. military action against Iraq is of enormous interest to both Australia and New Zealand."
Published On: 3/1/2003
Strategic Effects of Conflict with Iraq: The Middle East, North Africa, and Turkey
Strategic Effects of Conflict with Iraq: The Middle East, North Africa, and Turkey Dr W Andrew Terrill Monograph by the US Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute "War with Iraq will signal the beginning of a new era in American national security policy and alter strategic balances and relationships around the world. The specific effects of the war, though, will vary from region to region. In some, America’s position will be strengthened. In others, it may degrade without serious and sustained efforts."
Published On: 3/1/2003
Strategic Effects of Conflict with Iraq: Europe
Strategic Effects of Conflict with Iraq: Europe LTC Raymond A Millen Monograph by the US Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute "War with Iraq will signal the beginning of a new era in American national security policy and alter strategic balances and relationships around the world. The specific effects of the war, though, will vary from region to region. In some, America’s position will be strengthened. In others, it may degrade without serious and sustained efforts."
Published On: 3/1/2003
Strategic Effects of Conflict with Iraq: Post-Soviet States
Strategic Effects of Conflict with Iraq: Post-Soviet States Dr Stephen J Blank Monograph by the US Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute "An American-led war with Iraq will affect the international state system profoundly, particularly the potentially volatile set of regions that comprise the Former Soviet Union (FSU). Because the war with Iraq is not directly related to prevailing security conditions in the FSU, we can make the following predictions with reasonable certainty. Some, if not all, currently existing strategic factors in the FSU will continue, whether or not the United States goes to war with Iraq, and whether or not the war is short or long, conventional or one that witnesses the use of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and other forms of unconventional warfare."
Published On: 3/1/2003
Strategic Effects of Conflict with Iraq: Latin America
Strategic Effects of Conflict with Iraq: Latin America Dr Max G Manwaring Monograph by the US Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute "War with Iraq signals the beginning of a new era in American national security policy and alters strategic balances and relationships around the world. The specific effects of the war, though, will vary from region to region. In some, America’s position will be strengthened. In others, it may degrade without serious and sustained efforts."
Published On: 3/1/2003
Why Saddam will not Choose Exile
Why Saddam will not Choose Exile Dr W Andrew Terrill Op-Ed by the US Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute "During his rise to power, Saddam Hussein is reported to have taken his two young sons to Iraqi torture chambers to view acts of torment committed against the luckless individuals imprisoned there. One of these sons, Uday, grew up to be a psychopath, while the other, Qusay, became a cold disciplined killer like his father. Both learned from Saddam’s torturers to avoid the most horrible of all fates—helplessness before your enemies. It is a fate that Saddam himself will never accept."
Published On: 2/1/2003
Russia in Afghanistan and Chechnya: Military Strategic Culture and the Paradoxes of Asymmetric Conflict
Russia in Afghanistan and Chechnya: Military Strategic Culture and the Paradoxes of Asymmetric Conflict Major Robert M Cassidy Monograph by the US Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute "In this monograph, Major Robert Cassidy uses a detailed assessment of the Russian experience in Afghanistan and Chechnya to draw important conclusions about asymmetric warfare. He then uses this to provide recommendations for the U.S. military, particularly the Army. Major Cassidy points out that small wars are difficult for every great power, yet are the most common kind. Even in this era of asymmetry, the U.S. Army exhibits a cultural preference for the “big war” paradigm. He suggests that the U.S. military in general, including the Army, needs a cultural transformation to master the challenge of asymmetry fully. From this will grow doctrine and organizational change."
Published On: 2/1/2003
Page 27 of 30
1
...
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30