Skip to main content (Press Enter).
Toggle navigation
US Army War College - Publications
US Army War College - Publications
Search Army War College - Publications:
Search
Search
Search Army War College - Publications:
Search
Home
Regional Issues
Western Hemisphere
Europe & Russia
Middle East & North Africa
Central Asia & Caucasus
Sub-Saharan Africa
Asia Pacific
Strategic Issues
School of Strategic Landpower
Homeland Defense & Security Issues
Era of Persistent Conflict
Military Leadership
Military Change/Transformation
Landpower & Sustainment
Strategy & Policy
Center for Strategic Leadership
Collins Center Update
Issue Papers
Studies
Futures Seminar
Collections
PKSOI
PKSOI Papers
PKSOI Journal
Recent Articles
Army Heritage and Education Center
About Us
Contributors
USAWC Press
Parameters
Parameters Bookshelf
Podcasts
Press Collections
Archive
Army War College Review
The Carlisle Compendia
Colloquium Briefs
Letort Papers
Op-Eds
Practitioner's Corner
Articles
Books
Conference Papers
IRPs
Monographs
Strategic Estimate
For Authors
Press Tips
Publishing Guide
Contact Us
Home
:
News
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Results:
Category:
Parameters
Article Index, Volume 55, 2025
December 17, 2025
— Article Index, Volume 55, 2025...
MORE
Statement of Ownership, Management, and Circulation
December 17, 2025
— Statement of Ownership, Management, and Circulation (Required by 39 U.S.C. 3685)...
MORE
Book Reviews
December 17, 2025
— Book Reviews Winter 2025–26...
MORE
Reframing the Nature of Strategic Competition
December 17, 2025
— In this Corner, Dr. Antulio J. Echevarria II, professor of strategic competition at the US Army War College, critiques the essential concepts underpinning US doctrine concerning intrastate strategic competition. In this, his inaugural contribution, Dr. Echevarria discusses the shortfalls in the Joint concept of interstate strategic competition, namely, its failure to capture the true nature of that competition. A more extensive reading of the scholarly literature on strategic rivalry suggests the nature of strategic competition should be reframed to align more closely with the nature of war...
MORE
On Lethality: Toward a More Complete Definition and Formation of the Lethality Framework
December 17, 2025
— This article argues lethality should be conceptualized as a holistic and regenerative process in which adversarial militaries prepare for, adapt to, and sustain the application of force in conflict. Whereas the literature on lethality is widening to include the human war f ighter, attempts to define and measure lethality have proven problematic— a struggle this article seeks to remedy. Drawing on historical, doctrinal, and interdisciplinary perspectives, the authors argue that lethality includes the capacity to kill and elements of learning and adaptation. The proposed lethality framework offers policy and military practitioners a model for assessing and operationalizing lethality in military education, leadership development, and Joint force integration...
MORE
Mission Command’s Asymmetric Advantage Through AI-Driven Data Management
December 17, 2025
— Artificial intelligence can optimize mission command by condensing multisource field data that ascends the decision chain while distilling concise, decision-quality guidance to the tactical edge. Diverging from existing publications, this article positions information asymmetry as a defining pillar of mission command rather than a limitation. This article presents a condensation-distillation framework that manages complexity through data condensation, AI-driven distillation, and conceptual metrics to assess asymmetric information flows. Drawing on military doctrine, algorithmic-warfare literature, and current modernization programs, military practitioners will engage with a systems-thinking perspective, revealing how AI-enabled command and control can enhance decision clarity and reinforce the intent of mission command...
MORE
Drones and the Changing Character of War
December 17, 2025
— Cheap drones have transformed the character of war by creating a “mass effect” that challenges traditional principles of force concentration. Unlike commentary focused on offense-defense debates or ethics, this article explains how Jevons’s Paradox, the Red Queen Effect, and models like Lanchester’s Laws and Hughes’s Salvo Equations underpin this shift. Drawing on lessons from Ukraine, historical theory, and production trends, it explains why the production of cheap “precision mass” is expected to accelerate. For military and policy practitioners, the analysis offers urgent guidance for adapting tactics, procurement, and doctrine to a battlefield dominated by ubiquitous, low-cost drones—before adversaries exploit this advantage...
MORE
China’s Securitization of Agricultural Imports: A Case of Economic Statecraft Mixed Successes
December 17, 2025
— This article argues that the People’s Republic of China’s agricultural import diversification from 1995–2023 reflects a strategic effort to reduce reliance on US and allied suppliers while prioritizing national food security. Unlike prior studies focused on production or consumption, this analysis centers on trade patterns of high-value, strategically critical commodities. Using trade data and policy documents, it assesses shifts in supplier dependency, notably toward Brazil. This research offers policy and military practitioners insights into how food security intersects with economic statecraft, revealing vulnerabilities and strategic choices in global supply chains relevant to deterrence and resilience planning...
MORE
Security Implications of the China-Russia-North Korea Triangle
December 17, 2025
— This article analyzes the evolving strategic dynamics within the China-Russia-North Korea triangle and their implications for global security. It argues that while the strengthened Russia–North Korea relationship poses risks for China’s global strategy and its major economic partnerships, for now, China also derives some benefits from these close ties and considers the risks to be manageable. Drawing on recent diplomatic developments, military cooperation, and regional responses, the article offers a nuanced assessment of how this alignment affects European and Indo-Pacific theaters. The analysis provides US policymakers with insight into the risks of opportunistic aggression and the strategic calculations driving these partnerships...
MORE
A Hybrid Deterrence Model for Countering China
December 17, 2025
— This article argues that the United States deterrence-by-denial strategy is insufficient to deter China from attempting forcible unification with Taiwan, due to its neglect of ideological and psychological drivers in the Chinese Communist Party’s decision-making calculus. Unlike existing military-centric models, it introduces a hybrid deterrence framework that integrates denial and punishment across domains, coordinated by a Joint Interagency Organization. The article offers a practical model for deterring ideologically motivated adversaries through synchronized, multidomain planning based on coercion theory, behavioral deterrence literature, and strategic documents from US and Chinese sources...
MORE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10